cryptd.in

암호화폐 친화적인 인재를 위한 대체 링크드인

Treasury Stablecoin Proposal Draws Major Warning From Hyperliquid Policy Center–Here’s Why

-

by

cryptd.in
in

The Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), together with venture capital firm Paradigm, submitted a joint comment to the US Treasury on Tuesday, urging the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to refine parts of its proposed stablecoin compliance rule tied to the GENIUS Act. 

The rule is intended to implement anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions requirements for “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” (PPSIs), a category the proposal says should be able to innovate in payment stablecoins while operating under an “appropriately tailored” regime designed to manage illicit-finance risk.

Narrower Compliance, Less Burden

While they did not oppose the overall goal of the framework, Paradigm and the Hyperliquid Policy Center argued that key elements of the proposal need clearer boundaries—especially where compliance obligations may unintentionally spill over into areas that do not fit the GENIUS Act’s structure or Congress’s intent.

A major focus of the comments is how permitted payment stablecoin issuers’ duties should work in the secondary market, where PPSIs do not have a direct relationship with the underlying counterparties. 

In their view, the law makes clear Congress expected due diligence by PPSIs on their own customers, but did not intend a requirement for PPSIs to conduct additional diligence for trading that occurs in the secondary market.

The firms drew an analogy to traditional banking, saying that once regulated institutions run KYC when funds enter the system, they are not expected to monitor every spending event after cash is withdrawn. 

In the same way, Paradigm and the Hyperliquid Policy Center argued that decentralized peer-to-peer transfers of stablecoins—and other digital assets—should generally involve KYC only at the regulated on-ramps and off-ramps, with compliance costs focused where the relationship exists. 

They warned that a contrary approach could drive requirements for PPSIs to file large numbers of low-value suspicious activity reports (SARs), creating “noisy” reports with false positives that would impose costs on both PPSIs and FinCEN without clear public benefit. 

Hyperliquid Policy Center Urges Clarification

The comment also addresses the way the proposed rule defines and assigns obligations related to “lawful orders.” Paradigm and the Hyperliquid Policy Center said the proposal defines “lawful order” by incorporating the GENIUS Act definition of “person,” which in turn determines who may have to build technological capabilities.

They argued that, as drafted, the proposed rule could be interpreted too broadly, potentially pulling in developers of distributed ledger protocols, decentralized self-custodial interfaces, and other technologies that Congress excluded from the GENIUS Act’s definition of a “digital asset service provider.” 

The firms said this result would not align with Congress’s intent, and they recommended a clarification in the final rule to explicitly state that certain entities and technologies are not included within the scope of lawful order requirements.

According to Paradigm and the Hyperliquid Policy Center, failing to make that clarification could unintentionally impose lawful order obligations on every validator on networks like Ethereum (ETH), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Solana (SOL), and Layer 2 systems that validate transactions involving PPSI-issued stablecoins. 

They argued the predictable outcome would be that US validator stakes would move offshore, US blockbuilding operations would relocate, and the US share of the chain validator base would decline—outcomes they said would undermine both the GENIUS Act’s onshoring objectives and broader US interests.

Hyperliquid

Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com 

댓글

답글 남기기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

최신 피드

인기 카테고리

ko_KR 한국어
ko_KR 한국어 en_US English ro_RO Română et Eesti ja 日本語 ru_RU Русский de_DE Deutsch es_ES Español zh_CN 简体中文 fr_FR Français zh_TW 繁體中文 pt_PT Português it_IT Italiano pl_PL Polski tr_TR Türkçe nl_NL Nederlands id_ID Bahasa Indonesia el Ελληνικά uk Українська bg_BG Български cs_CZ Čeština fi Suomi hu_HU Magyar lv Latviešu valoda lt_LT Lietuvių kalba nb_NO Norsk bokmål sk_SK Slovenčina sl_SI Slovenščina sv_SE Svenska

웹사이트 검색

인기 스토리

태그

#AlexeyPertsev (1) #BidenCryptoBan (1) #BidenElection (1) #BinanceVsCoinbase (1) #B비트코인 (446) #BitcoinETF (3) #B비트코인기초 (1) #B비트코인 취급 (1) #B비트코인가격 (5) #B비트코인가격수준 (1) #B비트코인펌프 (1) #B비트코인예치 (1) #B비트코인서지 (1) #BitcoinTop (1) #Bitfinex (1) #B비트 단위 (1) #브레이스브리지캐피털 (1) #BRC20토큰 (1) #BTC취득 (1) #B울리스틱 예측 (1) #BullishSentiment (1) #C중국광업 (1) #CPIP리뷰 (1) #CryptoAsset (2) #CryptoBattle (1) #CryptoBoom (1) #CryptoExpert (1) #CryptoInsights (1) #CryptoMania (1) #CryptoMarket (4) #CryptoPrediction (1) #CryptoPredictions (1) #CryptoRegulation (2) #CryptoTakeoff (1) #CryptoTiming (1) #CryptoTips (1) #CryptoTreasury (1) #CryptoUncertainty (1) #DerivativeJump (1) #Dogecoin (74) #DogecoinGains (1) #DogecoinVolume (1) #DutchCourt (2) #ECommerce (1) 1TP5테엘살바도르비트코인 (1) 1TP5테더리움 (73) 1TP5테더리움통증 (1) 1TP5테더리움가격 (1) 1TP5전문가 의견 (1) #FedRateCut (1) #FiatCurrency (1) #FinancialImpact (1) #FinancialPrivacy (1) #FirmShutdown (1) #FrozenAccounts (1) #IllicitFunds (1) #인플레이션데이터 (1) #투자 (1) #투자손실 (1) #일본기업 (1) #LegalAction (1) #LegalImpact (1) #법률 (1) #라이트닝 네트워크 (1) 1TP5시장분석 (3) 1TP5시장 모니터링 (1) 1TP5시장 예측 (1) 1TP5시장 예측 (1) #MarketProjection (1) 1TP5마켓지원 (1) 1TP5시장변동성 (1) #M결혼 (1) #MemeCoin (5) #MemeCoins (2) #M광부수익성 (1) #MoneyLaundering (2) #MtGox (4) 1TP5북한암호화 (1) 1TP5노보그라츠예측 (1) #P가격 마일스톤 (1) #P가격 예측 (2) #P가격 질문 (1) #PriceSurge (1) #P형량 (1) #QuantAnalysis (1) 1TP5규제압력 (1) #SEC안티크립토 (1) #ShibaInu (6) #SocialBuzz (1) 1TP5기술분석 (1) #Toncoin (3) #TornadoCash (3) #TornadoCashDev (1) 1TP5토네이도캐시개발자 (1) #UKCrypto (1) #업사이드 잠재력 (1) #USCongress (1) #와이오밍랜드 (1) #XRP가격 (1) #XRP업스윙 (1)

유용한 링크

유용하다고 생각되어 공유하고 싶은 링크.