クリプトドットイン

暗号に強い人材のためのオルタナティブ・リンクトイン

Crypto Pioneers Sound Alarm Over Government Control of AI Knowledge

-

によって

クリプトドットイン
で

Crypto figures are warning that government control over what AI systems can know or discuss could create a dangerous precedent, after Erik Voorhees argued on X on July 28 that states should not decide what forms of intelligence are “safe.”

The post landed in the middle of a fresh debate over how much oversight AI companies should accept, a debate that picked back up after Anthropic laid out its own position on open-weights models.

Erik Voorhees Warns Against State Control of AI Knowledge

Voorhees, a longtime Bitcoin advocate and founder of the ShapeShift crypto exchange, posted his comment after Anthropic published a statement from CEO Dario Amodei pushing back on claims that the AI giant was advocating for the banning of Chinese open-weight models.

Amodei insisted that his company has “never advocated a ban on open-weight models” and argued that such systems can provide value for developers, businesses, and researchers when they do not have dangerous capabilities.

According to the executive, Anthropic’s main concerns involved authoritarian governments developing advanced AI for military or surveillance uses, along with the possibility of misuse in cyberattacks or biological threats. The company said it supports restrictions on access to advanced chips and action against industrial-scale distillation, as well as safety testing for highly capable AI systems.

The Information recently reported that the Trump administration was finalizing a framework for AI companies to voluntarily submit their most advanced models to the government for testing.

But Voorhees was not having it, saying that allowing governments to define acceptable AI knowledge could expand beyond its original purpose. In his post, he walked through a hypothetical progression starting from a seemingly reasonable rule against discussing bioweapons, then dangerous weapons generally, then anything contrary to public health and public safety, then anything that undermines financial solvency, and ending with the banning of unapproved encryption and a requirement that AI not obstruct government orders.

“Civilization must not permit the state to determine what manner of intelligence is ‘safe,’” he wrote, adding that only the United States has the cultural character to resist that outcome over time, and if it fails, then “nowhere will it be preserved.”

Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz replied to Voorhees’ post with “Yes, this. Exactly this,” showing support for the argument. XRP community member Bird also responded, asking, “The moment someone gets to decide what knowledge is ‘safe,’ where does it stop?”

AI Safety Debate Expands Beyond Open Models

The same tension over who gets to police AI showed up earlier this month when Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis proposed a federally backed body to test and certify frontier models before release, an idea that OpenAI’s Sam Altman called “thoughtful” and Microsoft’s Satya Nadella welcomed as a way to keep any model from doing serious harm.

However, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong rejected the idea, arguing that a new body would just add another approval process on top of existing regulators. “Why design regulation around a hypothetical problem,” he said, pointing to fraud, tort, and consumer protection laws that already exist as being enough cover for any harm that might be caused by a model.

ポスト Crypto Pioneers Sound Alarm Over Government Control of AI Knowledge に初登場した。 クリプトポテト.

コメント

コメントを残す

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 ※ が付いている欄は必須項目です

最新フィード

人気カテゴリー

ja 日本語
ja 日本語 en_US English ro_RO Română et Eesti ko_KR 한국어 ru_RU Русский de_DE Deutsch es_ES Español zh_CN 简体中文 fr_FR Français zh_TW 繁體中文 pt_PT Português it_IT Italiano pl_PL Polski tr_TR Türkçe nl_NL Nederlands id_ID Bahasa Indonesia el Ελληνικά uk Українська bg_BG Български cs_CZ Čeština fi Suomi hu_HU Magyar lv Latviešu valoda lt_LT Lietuvių kalba nb_NO Norsk bokmål sk_SK Slovenčina sl_SI Slovenščina sv_SE Svenska

ウェブサイトを検索

人気記事

タグ

#AlexeyPertsev (1) #Bidenクリプトバン (1) #Biden選挙 (1) #BinanceVsCoinbase (1) #ビットコイン (456) #BitcoinETF (3) #ビットコイン基礎知識 (1) #ビットコインの取り扱い (1) #Bビットコイン価格 (5) #BitcoinPriceLevel (1) #BitcoinPump (1) #BitcoinReserve (1) #ビットコイン・サージ (1) #Bitcoinトップ (1) #Bitfinex (1) #ビットワイズ (1) #BracebridgeCapital (1) #BRC20トークン (1) #BTC取得 (1) #Bullish予測 (1) #Bullishセンチメント (1) #中国鉱業 (1) #CPプレビュー (1) #CryptoAsset (2) #CryptoBattle (1) #CryptoBoom (1) #CryptoExpert (1) #CryptoInsights (1) #クリプトマニア (1) #CryptoMarket (4) #CryptoPrediction (1) #Crypto予測 (1) 1TP5トリプトレギュレーション (2) #CryptoTakeoff (1) #CryptoTiming (1) #CryptoTips (1) #CryptoTreasury (1) #CryptoUncertainty（暗号の不確実性 (1) #Dデリバティブジャンプ (1) #Dogecoin (74) #Dogecoinゲイン (1) #Dogecoinボリューム (1) #ダッチコート (2) #ECコマース (1) #ElSalvadorビットコイン (1) #Ethereum (74) #EthereumPain (1) #EthereumPrice (1) 1TP5専門家の意見 (1) #Fedレートカット (1) #FiatCurrency (1) #フィナンシャル・インパクト (1) #フィナンシャル・プライバシー (1) #Firmシャットダウン (1) #F凍結アカウント (1) 1TP5自己資金 (1) #InflationData (1) 1TP5投資 (1) 1TP5投資損失 (1) #日本ファーム (1) #法的措置 (1) 1TP5法的影響 (1) #法律 (1) #LightningNetwork (1) #市場分析 (3) #Mマーケットモニタリング (1) #M市場予測 (1) #市場予測 (1) #M市場予測 (1) #Mマーケットサポート (1) #マーケットボラティリティ (1) #マリッジ (1) #MemeCoin (5) #Memeコイン (2) #Miner収益性 (1) #マネーロンダリング (2) #MtGox (4) #北朝鮮暗号 (1) #ノボグラッツ予想 (1) #Priceマイルストーン (1) #P価格予測 (2) #Price質問 (1) #プライスサージ (1) #Prisonセンテンス (1) #QuantAnalysis (1) 1TP5規制圧力 (1) #SECアンチクリプト (1) #ShibaInu (6) #SocialBuzz (1) #技術分析 (1) #トンコイン (3) #トルネードキャッシュ (3) #TornadoCashDev (1) #TornadoCashデベロッパー (1) #UKクリプト (1) #Upsideポテンシャル (1) #USCongress（米国議会 (1) #ワイオミングランド (1) #XRP価格 (1) #XRPupswing (1)

お役立ちリンク

私が役に立ち、共有したいと思ったリンク