クリプトドットイン

暗号に強い人材のためのオルタナティブ・リンクトイン

Bitcoin BIP-110 Proposal Reopens Fight Over Ordinals And On-Chain Spam

-

によって

クリプトドットイン
で

A new Bitcoin improvement discussion is putting one of the network’s most divisive questions back in the spotlight: what should Bitcoin block space be used for? BIP-110, a proposal under developer discussion, aims to limit transaction types to payments and peer-to-peer transfers, a move that could affect inscription-heavy activity such as Ordinals and Runes.

TL;DR

  • Bitcoin developers are discussing BIP-110.
  • The proposal would aim to filter transaction types viewed as on-chain spam.
  • Ordinals and Runes traffic sit at the center of the debate.
  • BIP-110 is a proposal, not an active or scheduled hard fork.

The debate is not new. Since Ordinals brought inscription-style activity to ビットコイン, users have argued over whether that demand is a healthy fee market or a misuse of the chain. Supporters say Bitcoin is a permissionless network and users should be free to pay for block space. Critics argue that non-payment data clogs the network and moves Bitcoin away from its original monetary purpose.

The payment purist argument

The case behind BIP-110 is rooted in a simple view of Bitcoin: the network should prioritize payments and value transfer. From that perspective, transactions that carry inscription data are treated as a distraction from Bitcoin’s core function. If the network becomes too congested with non-payment traffic, regular users may face higher fees and slower confirmation times.

That argument has gained renewed attention because Ordinals and Runes reportedly account for a large share of current Bitcoin network traffic. Some estimates place inscription-related activity at more than two-thirds of traffic. Even if that figure changes over time, it explains why the issue keeps returning. Block space is scarce, and everyone using Bitcoin is competing for it.

The open block-space argument

The other side sees the proposal very differently. For Ordinals and Runes supporters, the point of Bitcoin is that users can broadcast valid transactions without asking permission. If someone pays the fee and follows consensus rules, they argue the network should not decide whether the transaction is morally or culturally acceptable.

There is also an economic argument. More activity means more fees. As Bitcoin’s block subsidy continues to decline over time, transaction fees become increasingly important for miner revenue. From that view, inscriptions may be messy, speculative, or even annoying, but they also help build the fee market that Bitcoin eventually needs.

Proposal, not policy

The most important caveat is that BIP-110 is not a scheduled hard fork and should not be reported as one. It is an active proposal and debate. Bitcoin’s development process is deliberately slow, conservative, and difficult to force through. A technical idea can create a lot of noise without ever becoming network policy.

Still, the conversation matters because it shows Bitcoin’s identity debate is far from settled. Is Bitcoin only money, or is it a settlement layer where any valid transaction can compete? BIP-110 may or may not advance, but the argument around it will continue to shape how users, miners, and developers think about the network’s future.

For readers, the next few sessions matter because Bitcoin often needs confirmation from several places at once: spot demand, exchange flows, derivatives positioning, and the broader macro mood. One signal can start the conversation, but the stronger read comes when those signals begin lining up.

This report is based on information from Bitcoin BIPs GitHub Repository.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Source: Bitcoin BIPs GitHub Repository

コメント

コメントを残す

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 ※ が付いている欄は必須項目です

最新フィード

人気カテゴリー

ja 日本語
ja 日本語 en_US English ro_RO Română et Eesti ko_KR 한국어 ru_RU Русский de_DE Deutsch es_ES Español zh_CN 简体中文 fr_FR Français zh_TW 繁體中文 pt_PT Português it_IT Italiano pl_PL Polski tr_TR Türkçe nl_NL Nederlands id_ID Bahasa Indonesia el Ελληνικά uk Українська bg_BG Български cs_CZ Čeština fi Suomi hu_HU Magyar lv Latviešu valoda lt_LT Lietuvių kalba nb_NO Norsk bokmål sk_SK Slovenčina sl_SI Slovenščina sv_SE Svenska

ウェブサイトを検索

人気記事

タグ

#AlexeyPertsev (1) #Bidenクリプトバン (1) #Biden選挙 (1) #BinanceVsCoinbase (1) #ビットコイン (458) #BitcoinETF (3) #ビットコイン基礎知識 (1) #ビットコインの取り扱い (1) #Bビットコイン価格 (5) #BitcoinPriceLevel (1) #BitcoinPump (1) #BitcoinReserve (1) #ビットコイン・サージ (1) #Bitcoinトップ (1) #Bitfinex (1) #ビットワイズ (1) #BracebridgeCapital (1) #BRC20トークン (1) #BTC取得 (1) #Bullish予測 (1) #Bullishセンチメント (1) #中国鉱業 (1) #CPプレビュー (1) #CryptoAsset (2) #CryptoBattle (1) #CryptoBoom (1) #CryptoExpert (1) #CryptoInsights (1) #クリプトマニア (1) #CryptoMarket (4) #CryptoPrediction (1) #Crypto予測 (1) 1TP5トリプトレギュレーション (2) #CryptoTakeoff (1) #CryptoTiming (1) #CryptoTips (1) #CryptoTreasury (1) #CryptoUncertainty（暗号の不確実性 (1) #Dデリバティブジャンプ (1) #Dogecoin (74) #Dogecoinゲイン (1) #Dogecoinボリューム (1) #ダッチコート (2) #ECコマース (1) #ElSalvadorビットコイン (1) #Ethereum (74) #EthereumPain (1) #EthereumPrice (1) 1TP5専門家の意見 (1) #Fedレートカット (1) #FiatCurrency (1) #フィナンシャル・インパクト (1) #フィナンシャル・プライバシー (1) #Firmシャットダウン (1) #F凍結アカウント (1) 1TP5自己資金 (1) #InflationData (1) 1TP5投資 (1) 1TP5投資損失 (1) #日本ファーム (1) #法的措置 (1) 1TP5法的影響 (1) #法律 (1) #LightningNetwork (1) #市場分析 (3) #Mマーケットモニタリング (1) #M市場予測 (1) #市場予測 (1) #M市場予測 (1) #Mマーケットサポート (1) #マーケットボラティリティ (1) #マリッジ (1) #MemeCoin (5) #Memeコイン (2) #Miner収益性 (1) #マネーロンダリング (2) #MtGox (4) #北朝鮮暗号 (1) #ノボグラッツ予想 (1) #Priceマイルストーン (1) #P価格予測 (2) #Price質問 (1) #プライスサージ (1) #Prisonセンテンス (1) #QuantAnalysis (1) 1TP5規制圧力 (1) #SECアンチクリプト (1) #ShibaInu (6) #SocialBuzz (1) #技術分析 (1) #トンコイン (3) #トルネードキャッシュ (3) #TornadoCashDev (1) #TornadoCashデベロッパー (1) #UKクリプト (1) #Upsideポテンシャル (1) #USCongress（米国議会 (1) #ワイオミングランド (1) #XRP価格 (1) #XRPupswing (1)

お役立ちリンク

私が役に立ち、共有したいと思ったリンク